Micro Focus Quality Center / ALM, previously known as HP Quality Center / ALM, is being utilized by Micro Focus in their new domain and tools. Nevertheless, the content provided on this page remains applicable.
Despite the predominance of Automation Testing in the current digital era, manual testing still forms a significant chunk (70-80%) of the testing procedures in some quality assurance (QA) departments. There are instances where the quality is solely assessed through manual testing due to the unadaptability of automated tools with the frequent modifications in some applications. For such scenarios, manual testing emerges as the only viable choice.
Recommended IPTV Service Providers
- IPTVGREAT – Rating 4.8/5 ( 600+ Reviews )
- IPTVRESALE – Rating 5/5 ( 200+ Reviews )
- IPTVGANG – Rating 4.7/5 ( 1200+ Reviews )
- IPTVUNLOCK – Rating 5/5 ( 65 Reviews )
- IPTVFOLLOW -Rating 5/5 ( 48 Reviews )
- IPTVTOPS – Rating 5/5 ( 43 Reviews )
Being the oldest form of testing, manual testing can be a tedious process. It necessitates the tester to have patience, innovative approach, open-mindedness, creativity, and expertise. Manual testers should be able to think unconventionally and empathize with the end users while examining the app.
The aspect of exploratory testing in manual testing enables the testers to exhibit their out-of-the-box thinking capabilities.
Manual testing plays a pivotal role in corroborating an application thoroughly. It is judicious to manually test the initially developed application during the early development phase before putting in additional efforts to develop test scripts.
An efficient manual testing professional is expected to detect critical and severe glitches in a web, desktop, or mobile application within a minimal timeframe.
Critical thinking is often needed as software development projects generally carry constrained timelines. Within these restricted time limits, it is imperative to ensure the quality of the product/application as “Time is Money”.
There are numerous tools to enhance the productivity of automated scripts, but there still exist situations where some test cases are not suitable or feasible for automation. Testers frequently face challenges regarding test scripts, test data, distinct applications for assessing test reports, and tracking defects, leading to errors like missing steps in a test script or entering incorrect test data.
While notable progress has been made to enhance the efficiency of automated testing, little effort has been directed towards increasing the effectiveness of manual testing.
Let’s examine a few factors that can render manual testing more efficient and effective for manual testing engineers.
What You Will Learn:
Factors Making Manual Testing More Productive:
- Initially, it’s essential to meticulously review the requirement document to fully understand each application and modifications before moving to functional testing.
- When devising test cases, prioritize areas where critical or major bugs are more likely to be discovered. Primarily focus on the sections that involve integration with other applications or the addition of new features instead of UI alterations.
- Ensure that test cases cover every minute detail of new applications or changes, illustrating all functionalities.
- Classify test cases based on their impact on the application so that high-priority tests can be covered within the given schedule. Test cases relating to minor UI adjustments can be passed over when time is constrained since they have a negligible influence on the application.
- When formulating test cases, clearly mention the test data and expected results for each case.
- Execute cross-browser functional testing as necessary for the application. Such testing includes examining the app on different operating systems with varied browser combinations. While functionality may remain constant, UI errors are often observed in cross-browser functional testing.
- Experience from previous projects can aid in identifying new test scenarios and understanding the application from various viewpoints. This strategic approach often reveals extraordinary bugs, unidentifiable through regular test case execution.
- Exploratory testing allows testers to analyze the application from the user’s point of view, bolstering their creativity.
- Testing applications at each phase of development is a recommended best practice since it is cost-effective and reduces the possibility of encountering severe bugs later. Defects detected later in the development process are more expensive to rectify than those identified during the early stages of testing.
- Ensure the bug reports are clear and easily comprehensible by developers. Provide detailed steps to reproduce the bugs so that developers avoid assuming scenarios while rectifying the defects, speeding up the bug-fixing process.
- Use efficient bug tracking tools such as JIRA, Bugzilla, etc., to report issues.
Manual Testing Challenges
Issues of manual testing include that it can be error-prone, labor-intensive, and time-consuming. Various challenges are encountered while performing manual testing. Some of these include:
- Execution of repetitive procedures in test cases.
- manual input of substantial data.
- Handling multiple screens and tools and executing cross-browser testing.
- Lengthy test case writing and management of test data.
- Recreating/reproducing noticed issues consumes considerable time.
- There is no record of test actions performed during exploratory testing.
The Solution
Micro Focus has introduced HP Sprinter, a manual software testing solution, to enhance speed, quality, and increase the effectiveness and efficiency of manual testing. HP Sprinter, also known as HP ALM/QC Sprinter, supports agile testing and maximizes the usefulness of exploratory testing.
Benefits of using HP ALM/QC Sprinter:
Main Features of HP ALM/QC Sprinter:
- It enhances and augments exploratory testing by better identifying reasons for defects or test outcomes.
- Provides faster results.
- Documents user actions during the execution of test cases, providing comprehensive test results.
- Rids of repetitive test cases through data injection.
- Simultaneously executes test cases on multiple machines to expand coverage and determine application compatibility across various environments.
- Mirror Testing: Allows for simultaneous testing of multiple environments.
- Boosts productivity by quickly resolving defects.
Micro Focus Sprinter download: You can download the HP Sprinter trial version from this page.
Have a look at this brief HP Sprinter demo video here:
Detailed Steps to Run a Basic Test Using HP Sprinter
Let’s delve into “How to run a basic test” using HP Sprinter with the aid of multiple screenshots.
1) HP Sprinter functions in two modes – ‘Plan’ and ‘Run’. Plan mode is for answering the test while the Run mode is dedicated to test execution.
(Note: Click on any image for an enlarged view)
<a href=”https://iptvassist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/HP-Sprinter-2