Is the Occupation of a Software Tester Truly Regarded as Low-Esteem as it Appears?
Often, the decision to become a Software Tester is not a deliberate one for some individuals, particularly at the beginning of our professional journey.
Recommended IPTV Service Providers
- IPTVGREAT – Rating 4.8/5 ( 600+ Reviews )
- IPTVRESALE – Rating 5/5 ( 200+ Reviews )
- IPTVGANG – Rating 4.7/5 ( 1200+ Reviews )
- IPTVUNLOCK – Rating 5/5 ( 65 Reviews )
- IPTVFOLLOW -Rating 5/5 ( 48 Reviews )
- IPTVTOPS – Rating 5/5 ( 43 Reviews )
Despite harboring a deep aspiration to become successful IT experts, we frequently equate the term “IT professional” with the position of a Developer. While the role of a developer is indeed fascinating and full of potential, the belief that the job of a tester is totally the opposite should not be presumed.
We often express uncertainty and question if it’s a wise career step when a testing role materializes.
Contents of This Presentation:
Misconceptions Concerning the Role of a Software Tester
Here are some of the misunderstandings that may crop up among entry-level IT professionals:
Myth #1: Lack of utilization of Engineering knowledge
Myth #2: Narrow prospects for learning
Myth #3: Testers are not acknowledged for the ultimate software product
Myth #4: Developers earn higher remuneration than testers
All of these myths are baseless. Allow me to elaborate:
Myth #1: Non-existence of Engineering Knowledge Application
- It is not uncommon for Computer Science graduates to feel crestfallen if our inaugural project in our first occupation is a testing endeavor. This is primarily because the field of Software Engineering does not encompass the Software Testing discipline. Consequently, we find it challenging to accept the fact that anything other than development, database, or network tasks can make a significant contribution to software creation. Feeling somewhat duped is understandable.
- On the other hand, although there might not be a rigid prerequisite for testers to possess a comprehensive grasp of programming languages, this trend seems to be shifting in favor of testers with programming abilities who are immensely sought after. If we persist a little longer and make an effort to comprehend everything related to the QA field, we will realize this. This is one instance where “our patience will pay off.”
- Interestingly, testers are remunerated to cast doubt on a product. There is no mischievous intent behind this. Our goal is to spot problematic areas before the users detect them, which can only be accomplished if we hold a thorough understanding of the software product. If this does not count as a knowledge application, then what does?
- The subsequent stage in exposing software flaws implies digging deeper. Root Cause Analysis is the study of a defect to pinpoint its origin, using the knowledge we have acquired from past experiences. This value-added skill is what testers should strive to attain.
Myth #2: Restricted Opportunities for Learning
- Testing is not a haphazard process. It entails copious planning, strategizing, comprehending technological aspects, managing time, and a focus on the less noticeable elements such as easy usage, market relevance, and software performance. The remarkable facet is that a tester gets a comprehensive, 360-degree view of the software from every perspective. Hence, gaining a deep understanding of Domain Knowledge, best practices within the software development procedures, and technical expertise are some additional domains that we can explore.
- Persistent learning is a pivotal factor that drives success in every profession, and testing is not an exception. We can opt to specialize in aspects such as performance testing, automation testing, security testing, database testing, or other technical testing methods. Alternatively, we can climb the career ladder and become Business Analysts, Technical Writers, or even Project Managers, leveraging our proficiency in process application, management, and business orientation.
- Collaborating with other project teams, facilitating/attending numerous meetings, drafting process documents/reports, and so forth form a major part of our job profile. This offers an incredible chance to boost our communication abilities, especially when it comes to writing and presenting information effectively.
Myth #3: Testers Gain No Recognition for the End Software Product
- Contrary to popular belief, the testing team has the decisive authority on whether a product is suitable for release or not. This equates to playing God, in a sense. 🙂
- We also have a golden opportunity to propose alterations/enhancements to improve the product. This is because from our viewpoint, “Even an omitted requirement or enhancement counts as a defect.”
- Truth be told, the industry does not display any prejudice against any team that plays a positive role in a software product. Our hard work doesn’t go unrecognized, and to believe otherwise would be entirely incorrect.
Myth #4: Developers Receive Higher Pay than Testers
- This is a misconception – the remuneration packages are on par.
- All junior professionals are entitled to the same compensation (irrespective of their discipline).
- As our careers advance, the salary depends on factors such as our previous earnings, experience in the relevant sector, expectations of the new role, financial condition of the new employer, prevailing market demand, etc. It is not contingent upon the specific IT division we work for.
Note: We must keep in mind that ambition and talent are paramount motivators. Some of us could have ambitions to excel in distinct areas and have set objectives beyond the Software Testing field. If that is the situation, then so be it. We wish you success in your endeavors.
We trust that the aforementioned myth-busters will give comfort to those among us who have unintentionally or involuntarily ended up in the testing sector. This is not a cul-de-sac, but a fork in the road leading to a bright future. In truth, it could be one of those inadvertent events we come to appreciate.
We encourage you to share your stories in the comments section, specifically those who accidentally landed a role as a tester and your thoughts on the QA field now. Are you in agreement with our compilation and clarifications?